Radu-Mihai ȘERBĂNESCU
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union with regard to the restrictive measures to combat terrorism. It will attempt to outline the primary conclusions drawn from this case law, as well as to evaluate the diverging views between the General Court and the Grand Chamber on the interpretation of the EU legal act governing terrorism sanctions. Departing from this debate, the paper will highlight the consequences of the prevailing views rendered by the Grand Chamber and how these will affect the future practice of EU in the field.